Pollard v. Coahoma County, Mississippi

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Pollard v. Coahoma County, Mississippi

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

MYRON POLLARD PLAINTIFF

V. CIVL ACTION NO. 4:20CV-166-GHD-JMV

COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; ET AL. DEFENDANTS

CONSOLIDATED WITH

MYRON POLLARD PLAINTIFF

V. CIVL ACTION NO. 4:20CV-176-GHD-JMV

CHARLES JONES, SHERIFF OF COAHOMA COUNTY, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN HIS OFFICAL CAPCITY; ET AL. DEFENDANTS

ORDER STAYING CASE

Before the Court are Defendants Coahoma County Sheriff Department; Coahoma County, Mississippi; Charles Jones, Sheriff of Coahoma County; and Deputy Eddie Earl’s motion to stay all proceedings [61] and motion for expedited review [62]; Plaintiff’s response [63] in opposition to the motion to stay; and Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s response [64]. The Court has considered the submissions of the parties, the applicable law, and the record and finds the motions should be and are GRANTED. The Court agrees with Defendants that the outcome of the state court criminal proceeding could impact, i.e., warrant dismissal of Plaintiff’s false arrest claim. The Fifth Circuit has explained “that, following Heck v. Humphry,

512 U.S. 477

,

114 S. Ct. 2364

,

129 L. Ed. 2d 383

(1994), district courts should stay § 1983 cases that may implicate the validity of the pending criminal proceedings until those underlying proceedings have run their course.” Gates v. Strain,

885 F.3d 874, 883

(5th Cir. 2018) (citing Mackey v. Dickson,

47 F.3d 744, 746

(5th Cir. 1995)) (“The court may—indeed should—stay proceedings in the section 1983 case until the pending criminal case has run its course, as until that time it may be difficult to determine the relation, if any, between the two.”)). Plaintiff did not address this issue and alleges no prejudice. Accordingly, all proceedings in this case are STAYED pending the outcome of the related criminal proceeding. A status conference will be set for no later than 120 days from the date of this order. SO ORDERED this 4th day of November, 2021.

/s/ Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Reference

Status
Unknown