Dee v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Dee v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

DEE CHARLES J PLAINTIFF

V. NO. 4:21-CV-174-DMB-RP

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT

ORDER

On August 15, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Roy Percy issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in this appeal from the unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of Social Security regarding Charles J. Dee’s application for supplemental security income. Doc. #33. The R&R recommends that the decision be affirmed. Id. at 1. No objections to the R&R were filed. “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.,

644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828

(E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415

, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no plain error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the R&R [33] is ADOPTED as the order of the Court. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of September, 2022. /s/Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown