UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

YOEL GUERRA-VINALES PETITIONER V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-3079-DPJ-ASH WARDEN COLBER RESPONDENT

ORDER Yoel Guerra-Vinals alleges prison officials have wrongfully denied him First Step Act (FSA) credits. The habeas petition is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. R&R [8]. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the petition because Petitioner has not exhausted his administrative remedies. Id. at 1 (citing Gallegos-Hernandez v. United States,

(5th Cir. 2012) (holding “a federal prisoner filing a § 2241 petition must first pursue all administrative remedies”)). The R&R issued on February 28 ,2024, and Petitioner had fourteen days to object to it if he wished. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); see R&R [8] at 1–2 (advising Petitioner of deadline). Petitioner did not object. “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983), quoted in Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by

(b)(1) as noted in Alexander v. Verizon Wireless Servs., L.L.C.,

(5th Cir. 2017). Finding no clear error, the Court accepts the well-reasoned recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [8] of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted as the finding and holding of this Court. The habeas petition is dismissed. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with the Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 18th day of March, 2024.

s/ Daniel P. Jordan III CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE