District Court, S.D. Mississippi, 2025

Jaime Sanchez v. Warden Yazoo City Low

Jaime Sanchez v. Warden Yazoo City Low
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · Decided October 17, 2025
Jaime Sanchez v. Warden Yazoo City Low

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION JAIME SANCHEZ PETITIONER V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-CV-153-KHJ-MTP WARDEN YAZOO CITY LOW RESPONDENT

ORDER Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker’s [8] Report and Recommendation. The Court adopts the [8] Report and dismisses with prejudice pro se Petitioner Jaime Sanchez’s (“Sanchez”) [1] Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Sanchez filed a Section 2241 petition seeking to apply First Step Act time credits to his federal criminal sentence. Pet. [1] at 1. Respondent, the warden of the federal correctional facility where Sanchez is housed, answered that Sanchez is ineligible for First Step Act relief because he is a non-U.S. citizen under a removal order. Resp. [7] at 1–2. Sanchez did not reply. Because Sanchez is subject to a final order of removal and ineligible for First Step Act time credits, the [8] Report recommends dismissing Sanchez’s [1] Petition with prejudice. R. & R. [8] at 2.

When no party objects to a Magistrate Judge’s report, the Court need not review it . 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Instead, the Court can apply the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion, and contrary to law” standard of review. , 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam).

Objections to the [8] Report were due on October 8, 2025. [8] at 3. The [8] Report notified Sanchez that failure to file written objections would bar further appeal in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). [8] at 3–4. Sanchez did not object to the [8] Report, and the time to do so has passed. The Court finds that the [8] Report is not clearly erroneous, an abuse of discretion, or contrary to law. So the Court adopts the [8] Report as its opinion.

The Court has considered all arguments. Those not addressed would not have changed the outcome. For the stated reasons, the Court ADOPTS the [8] Report and DISMISSES with prejudice Sanchez’s [1] Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court will enter a separate final judgment consistent with this Order.

SO ORDERED, this 17th day of October, 2025. s/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.