District Court, N.D. Mississippi, 2026

Isiah Williams v. State of Mississippi

Isiah Williams v. State of Mississippi
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · Decided March 23, 2026
Isiah Williams v. State of Mississippi

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION ISIAH WILLIAMS PETITIONER v. No. 3:25-cv-178-SA-RP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RESPONDENT ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE This matter comes before the court, sua sponte, for consideration of the transfer of this cause.

Isiah Williams has filed a document this Court has interpreted as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See [1]. Liberally construed, Williams challenges his 2006 conviction and sentence for sale of a controlled substance and resulting life sentence as a habitual offender in the Circuit Court of Panola County, Mississippi. The petitioner has filed at least two other unsuccessful § 2254 motions concerning the same conviction which she now seeks to challenge. See Williams v. Epps, et al., 2:10-cv-171-WAP-DAS and Williams v. Cain, 4:22-cv-88-DMB-DAS.

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act requires that before a district court files a second or successive petition, “the applicant shall move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). The petitioner has not obtained such an order. Rather than dismissing the petition on this basis, the Fifth Circuit, in accordance with the applicable statute, permits district courts to transfer the petition for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a) and (b)(3)(c). See In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997). Therefore, in the interest of justice and judicial economy, it is ORDERED: 1) That this petition will be transferred to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for the petitioner to seek leave to file this successive § 2254 petition; 2) That the Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this petition and the entire record to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §2244(a) and (b)(3)(c), and In re Epps, 127 F.3d at 365; and 3) That this case is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED, this, the 23rd day of March, 2026.

/s/ Sharion Aycock SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.