Michael Jordan v. Clayton Fulks, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL JORDAN PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL NO. 1:25-cv-00276-HSO-BWR CLAYTON FULKS, et al. DEFENDANTS FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Court’s Order issued this date and incorporated herein by reference, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Plaintiff Michael Jordan’s claims arising under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The claims dismissed pursuant to Heck are dismissed with prejudice “until the Heck conditions are met.” Johnson v. McElveen, 101 F.3d 423, 424 (5th Cir. 1996).

IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, this dismissal counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff is advised that, if he receives three strikes, “he may not proceed [in forma pauperis] in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Adongo v. Tex., 124 F. App’x 230, 232 (5th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)).

IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, Plaintiff’s Motion [15] to Amend Complaint is DENIED.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 20th day of April, 2026.

s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE