District Court, S.D. Mississippi, 2026

Alfonso Mendoza Perez v. Rafael Vergara

Alfonso Mendoza Perez v. Rafael Vergara
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · Decided May 27, 2026
Alfonso Mendoza Perez v. Rafael Vergara

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION ALFONSO MENDOZA PEREZ PETITIONER V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:26-cv-10-DCB-BWR RAFAEL VERGARA RESPONDENT ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Rath’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”) [ECF No. 9], which recommends that Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition [ECF No. 1] be dismissed without prejudice. The basis for this recommendation is that This argument is now foreclosed by Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi, 166 F.4th 494 (5th Cir. 2026), reh’g en banc denied (Apr. 9, 2026).

According to Buenrostro, Petitioner, an applicant for admission, has no statutory right to a bond hearing. Id. at 498, 502-08. The Report was entered on May 8, 2026, and objections were due by May 22, 2026. No party has objected to the Report.

Where no party has objected to a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of it. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”). Where there are no objections, the Court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review to the Report. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

The Court, having reviewed Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition [ECF No. 1] and Judge Rath’s Report, finds that Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition should be dismissed without prejudice. The Court adopts Judge Rath’s findings and conclusions in full.

Accordingly, The Court agrees with Judge Rath’s recommendation. The Report [ECF No. 9] is hereby ADOPTED and the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

A separate final judgment will be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of May, 2026. s/David Bramlette DAVID C. BRAMLETTE III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.