Ben Ventura v. Fran Vella-Marrone, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION BEN VENTURA PLAINTIFF v. CAUSE NO. 3:26-CV-114-SA-RP FRAN VELLA-MARRONE, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER DISMISSING CASE On May 7, 2026, Magistrate Judge Percy entered a Report and Recommendation [4], wherein he recommended that this lawsuit be dismissed “for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.” [4] at p. 2. Although the Report and Recommendation [4] explained the applicable procedure for Ventura to object to the recommendation, Ventura has not filed an objection, and the time to do so has now passed.

“With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.”

Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996)).

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation [4] and the record as a whole.

Having done so, the Court wholly agrees with Magistrate Judge Percy’s recommendation. There is no plain error on the face of the record. The recommendation is ADOPTED IN FULL.

Ventura’s claims are hereby DISMISSED. This CASE is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED this the 27th day of May, 2026. /s/ Sharion Aycock SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE