Shurronda L. Head v. Commissioner of Social Security

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION SHURRONDA L. HEAD PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:25-cv-79-JMV COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion [Doc. 25] for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and Defendant’s response [Doc. 26].

In these proceedings, Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying a claim for benefits. This Court’s Order [Doc. 24] granted Defendant’s motion to remand to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. [Doc.

23] A party who obtains a remand in a social security appeal pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) qualifies as a prevailing party for purposes of fees under the EAJA. Breaux v. U.S.D.H.H.S, 20 F.3d 1324, 1324 (5th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).1 Plaintiff, through her motion, seeks attorney fees in the amount of $4,441.50. In support of the motion, Plaintiff’s counsel submitted a statement regarding the time expended litigating this action. According to the motion, Plaintiff’s attorney spent a total of 23.5 hours on this case in 2025 and 2026 at a rate of $189.00 per hour, amounting to $4,441.50 of total work.

1 The fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) states “The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.”

The Court, having thoroughly considered the motion, noting that the Defendant does not oppose the award of EAJA fees, and the applicable law, finds the award is reasonable; and no special circumstance would make the award unjust.

Therefore, it is ordered that the Commissioner shall promptly pay Plaintiff $4,441.50 in attorney fees for the benefit of her counsel. As a matter of practice, an EAJA fee made payable to Plaintiff may properly be mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney.

SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of May, 2026. /s/ Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE