Hughes v. Daniel
Hughes v. Daniel
Opinion of the Court
OPINION THE COURT — by the
The demurrer to the declaration was properly sustained. The instrument upon which the suit is brought shows on its face an insufficient consideration. The defendants bound themsqlves in the pena I sum of $500;
The purchase had been made and completed with Darius Cameron; agreeably to the statement of the obligation, before it was entered into.— There was no new consideration moving defendants to enter into this obligation, and, without this, it is a nudum pactum.
If it were true, as plaintiff’s counsel contend, that the court should, in all cases, on sustaining a demurrer, give leave to amend, whether the leave be asked or not; yet this would appear to be a case in which no amendment will help. The consideration upon which the instrument was given, is expressed, and no other andjdifferent consideration inconsistent with that mentioned, can be alleged or proved.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- HUGHES v. DANIEL & TAYLOR
- Status
- Published