Young v. Jacoway
Young v. Jacoway
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a writ of error to Kemper count]/- circuit court.
Jacoway instituted an action of assumpsit upon a promissory note, made by Young payable to plaintiff. Upon the trial, Young introduced in evidence an instrument in writing, which
In the written contract there is no ambiguity. It purports to assign a portion of the interest of two Indians to a certain tract of land. The evidence went to show an assignment of another person’s interest, and also to limit the extent of that assignment. At law, a contract cannot rest partly in writing and partly in parol, and it is only in equity, as a general rule, that the true intent of a written contract can be shown by parol, when from mistake the contract does not exhibit truly the intention of the parties. The object of the plaintiff was to show that there was a mistake, and an omission in the written contract, and to correct that mistake and supply that omission. Such evidence has been properly held to be inadmissible. Peques v. Mosby et al., 7 S. & M. 340. The instructions of the court having been given with a view to evidence improperly admitted, were, as far as based upon that evidence, erroneous.
The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted by the court below.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.