Balfour v. Mitchell
Balfour v. Mitchell
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
We derive from the record that upon the 7th of March, 1846, Balfour, overseer of roads, instituted a suit before a justice of the peace against Mitchell, as a defaulter, placing his demand at $48. The judgment was for the defendant, and a judgment for costs against the plaintiff, in the sum of $1‘50. From this judgment an appeal was had to the circuit court. The record next discloses that upon the 5th of March, 1846, Balfour, in a similar capacity, instituted a suit against Mitchell, as a defaulter, and laid his demand at $ 10-50. The judgment in this case was likewise for the defendant, with costs against the plaintiff in the action in the sum of $1-50. There was an appeal in this case also to the circuit court. Both of these judgments were rendered in the justice’s court upon the samé day, to wit, March 23, 1846.
In the circuit court, a motion was made to consolidate the two appeals, and to dismiss them for want of jurisdiction. This motion was sustained, and the causes consolidated and dismissed.
■’ There were bills of exception filed to the judgments consolidating and dismissing the causes, but these bills are very bare, and contain nothing more than a mere statement that the causes were directed to be consolidated, and to be dismissed. We are left to conjecture upon what grounds the circuit court so acted, and in such cases, unless the party feeling himself aggrieved presents his case to us in such a shape as to point out in what particular the circuit court erred, we are bound, the contrary not being shown, to hold that the circuit court did not err. These remarks apply equally to the judgment dismissing, as to those consolidating the suits.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John Balfour v. John P. Mitchell
- Status
- Published