Portevant v. Pendleton's Administrators
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff in error instituted this suit against the original administrator of Pendleton. Process was served, and Prestidge the administrator appeared, but he died before trial. Administration de bonis non was granted to defendants in error, and the question is, Can a suit commenced, and pending undetermined, against the original administrator, be revived by scire facias against the administrator de bonis non?
By the common law all personal actions abated by the death of either party before judgment. 2 Tidd, 1024 ; 2 Sel-lon’s Practice, 191. The difficulties and delay produced by the operation of this rule, were remedied by the statutes of 17 Charles 2, and 8 & 9 William 3; which gave the scire facias to bring in the representatives of the plaintiff or defendant. But these statutes go no further than to authorize the bringing in the immediate representatives of the party to the suit.
The evils of the common law rule are also remedied by our statutes. In the first place, it is declared that actions commenced by or against a testator or intestate, shall survive for
The statute of 1846 remedies the defect in our law, by authorizing a suit commenced by or against an administrator, to be revived in case of his death in the name of the administrator de bonis non. But Prestidge had died some time before the act passed. The action abated by his death, and the legislature could hot revive a right of action which had been lost.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.