Magee v. Mellon
Magee v. Mellon
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Appellants filed their petition in the probate court of Hinds county, praying the allotment of dower to Martha Magee, in
It is insisted by the answer of appellee,, that the said Martha Magee, as administratrix, and Thomas Downing, as administrator of the estate of the said John Garman, deceased, in the year 1832, sold said lots under an order of the probate court of Hinds county; and that she is estopped by her deed from asserting a claim therein for dower. The language of the deed, bearing on this subject, is this : “ And the said administrator and administratrix, for them, their heirs and assigns, do forever warrant and defend the title of the above described land, to be free from the claim or claims of any person or persons, claiming by, through or under them, their heirs or assigns, and to be free from the claim of any persons whomsoever, unto the said party of the second part, his hens, executors and assigns, in fee simple forever.’’
| This covenant completely estops the petitioner. It is true, she was not bound to enter into it, but having freely done so, it must have its legal operation.
Decree affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jacob Magee et ux. v. Thomas A. Mellon
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published