Mulligan v. State
Mulligan v. State
Opinion of the Court
Error to the circuit court of Bolivar county, where the plaintiff in error was indicted, tried and convicted on a charge of robbery. A reversal of the judgment is asked for errors on the face of the record, in the instructions of the court to the jury, and in overruling a motion for a new trial.
An inspection of the record discloses the following omissions: It does not show the organization of the court; the judge presiding; the place at which it was held; the organization of the grand jury; the appointment of foreman; the indorsement and filing of the indictment; the names of the grand jurors ; that they were sworn and empanelled; that the indictment was returned into court by the foreman in the presence of at least twelve of the grand jurors; nor that the accused was present in court throughout the trial, particularly when the sentence was pronounced. 8 S. & M. 576 ; 10 ib. 192; 13 ib. 189 ; 4 How. 163; 3 S. & M. 518; 3 How. 422; 13 S. & M. 286; 26 Miss. 174; 39 ib. 613; 28 ib. 687 ; 5 How. 20 ; 25 Miss. 589.
The crime charged is a very heinous one, and, where clearly established, demands the utmost rigor of the law, yet, in this case, having found the accused guilty of an offense, openly committed and not denied, the jury recommended him “ to the extreme mercy of the court.” It appears from the record that the brothers Mac. and Dallas Mulligan, in 1871, in broad daylight, armed with deadly weapons, forcibly took from a citizen of Bolivar county, while riding peaceably upon
The judgement is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, for which purpose the defendant will be detained in custody or arrest, subject to the orders of the court where the indictment is pending.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mac. Mulligan v. The State of Mississippi
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Criminal procedure. — Judgment of conviction of robbery reversed, because the record did not show the time and place of holding the court, the name of the presiding judge, the organization of the grand jury, the proper return of the indictment into court, nor the presence of the accused when the sentence was pronounced.