Walker v. Joyner
Walker v. Joyner
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Bill filed June 1, 1874, to enforce lien on real estate. Summons issued on same day, returnable first Monday in same-month, being the 7th day of that month, and the first day of' the then next term of the chancery court of Alcorn county. This process was served on the day of its issuance. The defendant did not appear. There was a pro confesso on the 10th of the same month. Final decree followed at once, without reference to a master.
It is assigned for error that process was improvidently issued, and that the final decree was rendered without a reference to a master.
The Code, § 1005, enacts that “process shall be made returnable on the next rule day in vacation succeeding its issuance, or on the first day of the regular term of the court, to-be held ten days after the issuance thereof.” This would
Both grounds of error are technical, but they seem to be in accordance with the letter of the statute.
Decree reversed, and cause remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- J. H. Walker v. William Joyner
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Ohajstcjsky Practice : Issuance and return of process. Code of 1871, % 1005. The Code of 1871, $ 1005, requires process to be made returnable on the next rule day in vacation succeeding its issuance, or on the first day of the regular term, of the court, to be held ten days after the issuance thereof. This requires process, issued within ten days of the term, to be made returnable to the next rule day in vacation, although service five days before its return is sufficient. 2. Same : Same : ' Reference to a master. Where a bill is filed to enforce a lien on real estate, and the amount of indebtedness is to be ascertained, it is well settled that the court must refer it to the clerk and master, to state an account showing amount due.