Allgood v. Hill
Allgood v. Hill
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the”court.
The right of a board of supervisors to have shade-trees set in the ground connected with the court-house of its county is fairly implied in the grant of power to such boards by the Constitution and laws in reference to court-houses. Const, art. 12, § 16, art. 6, § 20; Code, § 1363. Shade-trees may be necessary to make a court-house “ good and convenient.” There is no express grant of power to have fences made around the court-house yard, or to dig wells or cisterns, or to protect the ground against washing; but as the law empowers the boards of supervisors to acquire so much ground as may be necessary and convenient for the building and use of the court-house, and requires the ei’ection and keeping in repair in each county of a “ good and convenient court-house,” it is
The instruction given for the plaintiff below should have been refused.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- J. B. Allgood v. S. V. D. Hill
- Status
- Published