Smiley v. Meyer, Weis & Co.
Smiley v. Meyer, Weis & Co.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opiiuion of the court.
The judgment described in the bill is not against Mrs. Smiley, and her piroperty cannot be reached by it; and unless the court of chancery has jurisdiction of the demand against her, as a contract made by her in the course of trade and business as a feme sole, under section 1780 of the Code, the
Decree reversed, demurrer sustained, and bill dismissed without prejudice to the rights of complainants.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Edward E. Smiley et ux. v. Meyer, Weis & Co.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Married Woman. Judgment against her agent. Chancery jurisdiction. A judgment against L. & S., agents, is not binding- on their wives, even though the note upon which it is founded was given br L. & S. as agents for their wives, doing business as femes sole; and chancery has no jurisdiction under our statute, nor by the prior law, to enforce such judgment against the property of the wives.