Redd v. Thompson
Redd v. Thompson
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court..
It is only by virtue of statutory provisions that this court can render judgment for damages against an appellant. Sect. 414 of the Code authorizes judgment against the appellant for the debt, with five per cent damages thereon, and costs, etc. '“"binder this, in case of the affirmance of the judgment or decree, if this court enters up judgment against the appellant for the debt, it should add five per cent damages thereon; but if judgment is not entered up against the appellant for the debt, but only for the sale of land or other property, damages cannot be added. Sect. 415 of the Code provides for damages “ in case the judgment be for specific personal property,” and “ on a judgment for mesne profits of real estate,” and sect. 1259 of the Code gives damages on the affirmance of a decree “ for a money demand, or for the dissolution of an injunction, or other restraining'process,” “ at thé rate óf five per centum on the .amount due#the appellee,” etc. These are all the statutes on this subject, and it is-manifest that they do not embrace the case of a decree for the sale of property to satisfy a sum of money adjudged to be paid out of ,the proceeds of its
Motion denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thomas S. Redd v. P. H. Thompson
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- SUPREME Court. Affirmance, of decree. Damages against appellant. It in only by virtue of statutory provisions that the Supreme Court can render a decree for damages against an appellant in any case. And there is no statute authorizing this court to adjudge damages against an appellant on the affirmance of a decree for the sale of land, or other property, and the application of the proceeds thereof to the payment of a demand established against it, there being no decree in personam for the debt. To allow damages, in such a case, on the amount of the demand, would be unjust, as well as illegal.