Medford v. Frazier
Mississippi Supreme Court
Medford v. Frazier, 58 Miss. 241 (Miss. 1880)
Chalmers
Medford v. Frazier
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
None of the grounds of demurrer are well taken. The only one which demands special notice raises the question whether it is admissible in a bill t'or partition to pray for an account for rents against such of the co-tenants as have been in possession of the common property. This question, though of first impression here, is well settled elsewhere in the affirmative. Freem. on Co-ten., sect. 512, and cases cited.
The occupying co-tenant will not be liable for rents unless it be shown that he has occupied more than his just proportionate share of the common estate, and then only for the rent of the excess.
Decree affirmed, and sixty days given to answer.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- H. C. Medford v. J. L. Frazier
- Cited By
- 7 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Partition. Tenants in common. Account for rents. When proper. In a bill filed by tenants in common for the partition of the common estate, the complainants may claim an account for rents received by a defendant co-tenant who has been in possession of the common property; but the latter will be liable onlj’ where it is shown that he has occupied more than his rightful share of the common estate, and then only for the rent of the excess.