Sudduth v. Sudduth
Sudduth v. Sudduth
60 Miss. 366
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Wallace v. Wallace (Miss. 1917)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
By the conveyance to the trustee there was limited a use to Sarah B. Sudduth and the heirs of her body, to be begotten by her then husband, the grantor. This, under the statute de donis, would have been a fee tail, and by our statute is converted into a fee simple. McKenzie v. Jones, 39 Miss. 360.
The decree is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.