Sudduth v. Sudduth
Sudduth v. Sudduth
60 Miss. 366
Sudduth v. Sudduth
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
By the conveyance to the trustee there was limited a use to Sarah B. Sudduth and the heirs of her body, to be begotten by her then husband, the grantor. This, under the statute de donis, would have been a fee tail, and by our statute is converted into a fee simple. McKenzie v. Jones, 39 Miss. 360.
The decree is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.