Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. Ligon
Opinion of the Court
Opinion.
delivered the opinion of the court:
It is impliedly, if not expressly admitted that the amount of damages found is not excessive, that it was the direct result of the fire which sprung from the negligence and want of care of the railroad hands by whom it was kindled, but it is insisted that the facts did not warrant the application of respondeat superior, since in building the fire the hands acted for their own comfort, and not for that of the superior, or while properly conducting his business.
We rest our conclusion wholly on the following facts testified to by two witnesses: The weather was quite cold, and the hands under the control of a section boss were handling iron tools, and obliged to do so in order to execute their master’s business. In doing this their uniform practice was to kindle fires in order
We cannot say the jurors erred in holding their superiors liable.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.