Illinois Central R. R. v. Andrews

Mississippi Supreme Court
Illinois Central R. R. v. Andrews, 61 Miss. 474 (Miss. 1884)
Cooper

Illinois Central R. R. v. Andrews

Opinion of the Court

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The failure of the defendant to interpose its defense in the magis*478trate’s court did not preclude it from defending in the circuit court on appeal. Callahan & Co. v. Newell, ante 437.

Section 1627 of the Code of 1880, which authorizes the plaintiff who sues upon an open account- to make oath to the correctness of the account, and gives to such sworn account the character of evidence, is not applicable except in cases where the cause of action arose ex contractu. Miss. Central Railroad Co. v. Fort, 44 Miss. 423.

Reversed..

Reference

Full Case Name
Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. W. H. Andrews
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
1. Appeal. From, judgment by default in justice’s court. The failure of a defendant to interpose a defense in the magistrate’s court does not preclude him from defending in the circuit court on appeal. Callahan v. Newell, ante. 2. Action on Open Account. Section 1627, Code 1880, construed. Section 1627, Code 1880, is only applicable when the cause of action arises ex contractu.