Marx v. State
Marx v. State
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The scire facias does not recite the day or term of the court on which the judgment nisi was taken. It is apparent that the attention of the court was not directed to this fact, but it nevertheless exists, and the defendant having interposed a plea of nul tiel record
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- R. M. Marx v. State
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Scire Facias. Not reciting date of judgment nisi. Judgment final. When the scire facias fails to recite the day or term of court when the judgment nisi was rendered, and a plea of nul tiel record is interposed, it is error to render judgment final without first amending the writ. 2. Same. Appellate proceedings. Amendment. When the record fails to show the date of the judgment nisi in proceedings on a forfeited recognizance the ease will be reversed on appeal, and amendment allowed when the case returns to the lower court. 3. Recognizance. Judgment against one surety. Dismissal as to others. Where the return on the scire facias shows that the principal and all the sureties on the bond, except one, could not be “ found,” it is not error to dismiss as to those not “ found” and to proceed to judgment against the surety served. Pounds v. The State, 60 Miss. 925.