Board of Supervisors v. Candler
Board of Supervisors v. Candler
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The question presented for decision in this case is whether or not appellee is entitled to the statutory reward of one hundred dollars for arresting a person who had killed another, and was fleeing, or attempting to flee, before arrest. It appears from the record that Lewis Lackey was charged with murdering his wife in Itawamba County, in October, 1882; that, under a warrant issued by a jus
The decision of the board of supervisors should have been affirmed. The claim was not within the statute. Lackey had been arrested by another for the offense with which he was charged, and tried and discharged by a justice of the peace of the county, before he was arrested by appellee. By the very terms of the statute the allowance of such claim is authorized only when some one is arrested who has killed another, and is fleeing, or attempting to flee, before arrest, etc. Code 1880, §' 3035.
Reversed, and judgment final here for appellants.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Board of Supervisors of Itawamba County v. D. B. Candler
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Reward. Arrest for homicide. Section 3035, Code 1880, construed. Section 3035 of the Code of 1880 provides that “Any person who shall arrest any one who has killed another, and is fleeing, or attempting to flee, before arrest, and shall deliver him up for trial, shall be entitled to the sum of one hundred dollars.” One who under this statute arrests and delivers up for trial for homicide a person who has been previously arrested for the same killing, and tried and discharged by a committing magistrate, is not entitled to the reward mentioned.