Fitzpatrick v. Beal
Fitzpatrick v. Beal
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The sale is not maintainable. If made under § 2113 of the code it is void, because of the want of compliance with its requirement that “ a summons shall issue for at least three of the near relations of the minor, if there be any in the State.” Temple v. Hammock, 52 Miss. 360.
If made with reference to § 2114, it is void, because that applies only where land is held by the ward as heir or devisee jointly with .other heirs or devisees, who must be summoned on the application
This land had not descended to the minors and others. They were the only heirs of Mrs. Gates, and inherited from her the entire interest decreed to be sold.
Unless it be true, as ingeniously argued by counsel, that the minors were co-heirs as to each other, and as both had the same guardian there was no necessity for summoning the co-heir, who was represented by guardian, it is apparent that § 2114 is not applicable.
We think it manifest that this section applies only when the guardian seeks a decree of sale on the ground that an equal division of the land held by his ward and other co-heirs or co-devisees cannot conveniently be made. If the sale is sought for division of the interest descended or devised, it -is sufficient to summon co-heirs or co-devisees, but where the object is not to effect a division of joint interests but the application is to sell the minor’s interest, whether held in severalty or jointly with others, on the ground that it will be beneficial to the ward or for his interest, at least three of the near relations of the minor must be summoned, or it must be made to appear by the record of the proceeding for sale that they were not summoned because there were none such in this State. Erwin v. Carson, 54 Miss. 282.
When the sale is to be made for the maintenance and education of the ward, because of the insufficiency of the personal estate and the rents and profits of the real estate for that purpose, or if it should be deemed most advantageous to the interests of the ward to sell'real estate in preference to the sale of personal estate for the maintenance and education of the ward, as provided by § 2109 of the code, a summons is not necessary, but the court may act on the application of the guardian.
Decree reversed and hill dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- L. A. Fitzpatrick v. T. J. Beal, Guardian
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Guardian and Ward.. Sale of land'und'er % 2113, Code of 1880. No summons to relatives. Section 2113 of the Code- of 1880,. which authorizes the chancery court to order the sale of a ward’s land upon, the-petition of the guardian setting forth the reasons why a sale would be beneficial to the ward, requires that “ a summons shall issue for at least three of the near relatives of the minor, if there be any in the State.” A decree of sale under this statute rendered without the issuance of a summons to any relatives of the minor or any good showing for the non-issuance therefor is absolutely void. Temples. Howard, 52 Miss. 360, cited. 2. Same. Sale of land. Section 2114, Code 1880, constmed. Section 2114 of the Code of 1880, which provides for the sale of a ward’s share or interest in land descended or devised to “heirs or devisees jointly, one or more of whom are minors,, and an equal division thereof cannot be made,” doesnot apply where a guardian seeks to sell a two-fourths undivided interest of his two wards inherited in lands, the other interests in which belong to persons not their co-heirs. This section only applies where a ward holds land as heir or devisee 'jointly with other heirs or devisees, and a separation of his interest from theirs is sought; in which case the co-heirs or devisees must he summoned. 3. Same Sale of land. Section 2109, Code 1880, construed. Where, under $ 2109 of the Code of 1880, a guardian applies for the sale of his ward’s land because of the insufficiency of the personal estate and the rents and profits of the real estate to maintain and educate him, or because it is deemed preferable that the real estate be sold instead of the personal estate for that purpose, the court may act upon such application without the previous issuance of a summons.