Dreyfus v. Cage
Dreyfus v. Cage
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Bills of exception are regulated by statute §§ 1715-1718 of the code. Two kinds are provided for, viz.: To any ruling of the court made before the jury retire from the box, and to overruling motions for new trial. By § 1715 the party aggrieved by any decision of the court may tender to the judge a bill of exceptions to his opinion, stating therein the matters of law wherein he is supposed to err, and the judge shall be bound to sign the same, and the bill of exceptions so signed shall be made and considered a part of the record in the cause. Being a part of the record, it is not within the power of the judge who signed it, after the expiration of the term of the court, or of this court, to make or cause to be made any alteration in it. Bridges v. Kuykendall, 58 Miss. 827.
No statute authorizes an amendment of a bill of exceptions. The assumption is that no mistake can occur in a bill of exceptions, as certainly none should be made or is likely to be if the course plainly indicated by the statute is pursued.
The manifest contemplation of the statute is the signing of a bill of exceptions by the judge when a correct one is tendered to him.
Motion denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Sol. Dreyfus v. Westley Cage
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Bill of Exceptions. Preparation. Signature of counsel. Bills of exception, if correct, must be signed by tlie judge when presented ; and if he refuses to sign them, signatures of two counsel, under Code 1880, $ 1717, is the only remedy. 2. Same. Time of signing. Limitation. Code 1880, ? 1718, is a limitation on the judge’s right to sign bills, and they cannot be signed later, but a bill to an order overruling a motion for a new trial, if presented during the term, should be then signed. ■ 3. Same. Amendment. Mandamus When signed, as provided for in Code 1880, $ 1718, the bill of exceptions is a part of the record, and as such is inviolable, and neither the circuit nor supreme court can amend the same.