Deans v. Robertson
Deans v. Robertson
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Qui hceret in litera, hceret in cortice.
But it is true that who seeks equity must do equity, and that a bill to cancel a contract on the ground of illegality will not be maintained unless it offers to pay what is justly due, and on this ground the demurrer was properly sustained. 1 Pomeroy’s Eq. Jur., § 391; 1 Story’s Eq. Jur., § 642.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.