Gwynn v. State
Gwynn v. State
Opinion of the Court
delivered .the opinion of the court.
We entertain no doubt of the power of the circuit court to require a witness who has been subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury to enter into a recognizance to appear either at a present or future term. The grand jury is a part of the court, and its proceedings are under the supervision of the ‘presiding judge. It is true that in its deliberations he may not interpose nor take part, but neither can he participate in the deliberations of a petit jury, and that he may not so do does not in the one case more than in the other restrict him in the exercise of all proper and usual control over the machinery provided by law for the aid of the jury in performing the duties devolved on it. The court has all the power belonging to a court of oyer and terminer and general jail delivery (Code of 1880, § 1493), and the judge is a conservator of the peace (code, § 2268). The power to require persons to enter into recognizances to appear before the grand jury is one which has been immemorially exercised by circuit courts, and this of itself would be a potent consideration if the existence of the power were otherwise doubtful.
But there is a fatal variance between the judgment nisi and the scire facias. The judgment nisi is for a failure to appear and testify before the grand jury as by his recognizance he was bound
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded to be further proceeded with in the court below.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- E. B. Gwynn v. State
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Circuit Court. Witness. Recognizance to appear before grand jury. Power of court to require. A circuit court bas full power to require a witness, subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury, to enter into a recognizance to appear before such grand jury either at the present or a future term of that court. Scire Facias. Variance between it and judgment nisi. Case in judgment. Practice. Amendment. bo A judgment nisi recites that it is for a failure of defendant to appear and testify before the grand jury, as by his recognizance he was bound to do; the scire facias issued thereon recites that a judgment nisi has been entered against the defendant for a failure to appear to answer to the Starte of Mississippi “on.a charge of failure to testify before the grand jury.” The defendant demurred to the writ. Held, that the variance between the judgment nisi and the scire facias is fatal here, hut the writ 'might have been amended in the court below so as to conform to the judgment nisi. 3. Same. Pleading. Demurrer. Case in judgment. In the above-stated case the defendant filed a paper objecting to the writ on the ground of its variance from the judgment, and asking if he should further answer such writ. The court submitted the question thus presented to a jury. Held, that the submission to a jury was error, as the paper presenting the defendant’s defense was a demurrer; and not a plea.