Hirsch v. Shafer, Schwartz & Co.
Hirsch v. Shafer, Schwartz & Co.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The notice filed by appellant, to show that she was not a part:ner of the firm sued, was without authority of law, and presented no issue. The partnership could be denied only by special plea, verified by oath. Code, § 1633.
But if there was no mutual misunderstanding in regard to trying •that issue without formal pleading on the part of appellant, the record shows that the notice referred to was treated by appellees as a plea, or in such manner, perhaps, as to mislead appellant, and she should, in order to bring the controversy between the parties fairly to ■trial, have been allowed to file a plea, denying the partnership under •oath, as she sought to do. This'would have been in accordance ■with the spirit of § 1581 of the code.
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Henrietta Hirsch v. Shafer, Schwartz & Co.
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Pleading. Denial of partnership. A person, sued as a member of a Arm, can deny the partnership only hv special plea, verified by oath. Code 1880, $ 1633. 2. Amendment. But where such defendant has failed to deny the partnership under oath } and has merely filed a notice that he is not a partner, which is treated by the plaintiff as a plea, or so as to mislead the defendant, he should, in order to bring the controversy fairly to trial, be allowed upon the trial to file the requisite sworn .plea.