Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. Tupelo Furniture Mfg. Co.
Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. Tupelo Furniture Mfg. Co.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The first and second instructions given for the. plaintiff are
We think the better reason and policy and the greater number of cases adjudged favor the rule to require the carrier which delivers goods damaged, and which ai’e shown to have started on their journey over connecting lines of transportation in good condition, to. exculpate itself from liability by showing that the injury did not occur by its default.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mobile & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Tupelo Furniture Mfg. Co.
- Cited By
- 10 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Carriers. Connecting lines. Damages. Presumption. Where goods shipped over connecting lines are delivered to the consignee in a damaged condition, and it is proven that they started on their journey in good condition, the carrier thus delivering them to the consignee will he liable for the damage, unless it shows that the injury did not occur through its fault.