Brandt v. Murphy
Brandt v. Murphy
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The fund which it is sought in this proceeding to require the appellee to pay to appellant is admitted by the demurrer to be the product of a tax illegally levied upon and collected from the taxpayers of the town and separate school district of Pass Christian ; and it is admitted, further, that the board of supervisors of Harrison county, upon a proper application made by the official representative of these wronged tax-payers, has made an order waiving and disclaiming all interest in and right to this fund, and directing its custodian, the appellee, to pay it over to the representative and agent of those persons from whom, by the board’s unlawful order in making the levy, it had been collected wrongfully.
The board of supervisors has, by a formal order, declared that this fund is wrongfully held in the county treasury, and has appropriated it to those from whom it was improperly taken, and we see no difficulty in sustaining the board’s action, in this matter, touching a fund to which the county is shown to have no legal right, and to which, ex aequo et bono, the wronged tax-payers, or their official representative and agent, are clearly entitled.
It may be proper to add, that the appellee having formally signified his purpose not to pay over, as directed by the order of the board of supervisors, there was no necessity on appellant’s part to wait the expiration of the sixty days, and hence, the suit was not prematurely brought. And, furthermore, the sum demanded is for a sum certain, clearly and specifically shown by the petition and its exhibits, and admittedly correct by the demurrer.
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Geo. P. Brandt, Treasurer of Pass Christian v. W. B. Murphy, Treasurer of Harrison County
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Taxes Illegally Collected. Repayment of fund. Mandamus. Where taxes illegally levied by the board of supervisors upon property in a town, which is a separate school district, have been paid to the oounty treasurer, and the board has entered an order disclaiming the fund and directing it paid over to the treasurer of the town, mandamus will lie to compel such payment. 2. Suit : whew not .Premature. Refusal of officer in advance. ■ In such case the treasurer being directed by said order to pay within sixty days, and having signified his determination not to comply, a suit to enforce compliance brought within the sixty days is not premature. 3. MaSdamus. For sum certain. The petition for mandamus, showing the assessed value of property within the town, the rate of taxation and the amount improperly withheld, is for a sum certain and is not objectionable on demurrer.