Hanon & Sons v. Weil Bros.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Popp v. Daisy Gold Mining Co. (Utah 1900)
- Pearson v. Kendrick (Miss. 1896)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
An appeal does not lie from an order of a chancellor, vacating the appointment of a receiver, absolutely or conditionally, and directing a return of property to the person from whom it was taken. This is not a change of the possession of property, within the contemplation of § 2311 of the code. It is mei’ely a restoration of the 'status quo as existing before the appointment of the receiver. The refusal to appoint a re-, ceiver may not be appealed from, and the removal of the receiver is not appealable.
Motion to discharge the supersedeas is sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.