Marks v. Howard
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Smith v. Williams-Brooke Co. (Miss. 1916)
- Glenn v. Caldwell (Miss. 1896)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellees are not represented in this court, but we have carefully examined the record to discover any failure of appellant to support his right to recover possession of the
The appellees had executed a deed of trust upon their lands, and, after fox’feiture, their light of possession, as agaixxst the trustee, expired. The trustee thereafter had aright to invoke the summary remedy afforded by the statute to recover possession of the land.- J3y the sale and coxxveyance this right, together with all other rights existing in the trustee, passed to the purchaser, who became the assignee of the trustee, ixoldiixg in privity with such trastee,, aixd, as such, entitled to maintain this action.
Judgment reversed
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.