Baldwin v. Morgan

Mississippi Supreme Court
Baldwin v. Morgan, 73 Miss. 276 (Miss. 1895)
Cooper

Baldwin v. Morgan

Opinion of the Court

Cooper, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellee’s claim against appellant was not upon open account, but upon a contract of employment by the month at a fixed and definite sum. The affidavit contained as full information as could be given by filing an independent paper. The claim did not consist of “items,” and therefore an “itemized account” could not be filed. An item is an article; a separate particular in an account. Webster’s Dictionary.

The judgment is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
E. E. Baldwin v. T. B. Morgan
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
1. Laborer’s Lien on Crop. Enforcement of same. Affidavit. Itemized accomit. Code of 1892, $ 2684. Section 2684, code of 1892,' provides that every laborer may enforce his statutory lien for wages due to him on his employer’s interest in the crop made in the course of his employment “by making affidavit before the clerk of the circuit court, or a justice of the peace of any county where the subject-matter of the lien may be, describing therein the products sought to be subjected, setting forth his claim, his share or interest therein, and asserting his lien thereon, with an itemized account of his deinand,” etc. In a proceeding under this statute, where the contract of employment was by the month at a fixed and definite sum, and the affidavit states, along with the other necessary averments, that the amount claimed is for wages earned in producing the farm products specified, it is not error to overrule a motion to quash the writ of seizure issued, because of plaintiff’s failure to file an itemized account of his demand and to allow the plaintiff to file such account at the trial. 2. Same. Affidavit. Itemized account. Items. Code of 1892, § 2684. Where the affidavit filed by a laborer for the enforcement of his lien for wages against his employer’s interest in the crop contains as full information as could be given by the filing of an independent paper, and his claim does not rest upon open account, but in contract for a definite sum per month, and does not consist of items, the filing- an itemized account of his demand is unnecessary, an item being an article or separate particular in an account.