Stanford v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court
Stanford v. State, 76 Miss. 257 (Miss. 1898)
Whitfield

Stanford v. State

Opinion of the Court

Whitfield, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The ‘ ‘ marking ’ ’ the indictment filed, dating it, and signing the entries on it, by the clerk, are made, by § 1316 of code of 1892, the exclusive “legal evidence of the finding and presentation of the indictment. ’ ’ This was not done in this case, at the term at which the alleged indictment was found. Ita lex soripta est. The demurrer should have been sustained.

Judgment reversed, indictment quashed and cause remanded. Appellant will be held to answer such new indictment as the grand jury may prefer against him.

Reference

Full Case Name
William R. K. Stanford v. State of Mississippi
Cited By
10 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Criminal Procedure. Cods 1893, $ 1346. Return and presentment of indictments. * The exclusive evidence of the finding and presentation to the court by the grand jury of an indictment, under code 1893, $ 1346, is the filing thereof and the dating and signing of the entry by the clerk.