Elmore v. State
Elmore v. State
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The indictment alleges that the defendants, being under contract to keep public road No. 11 in good repair, did unlawfully neglect said duty, and suffered it to remain in bad repair. Section 10, ch. 119, acts 1900, makes a contractor liable as for a misdemeanor for neglecting his duty; but the contractor must be a person who has become such under that act. And by that act it is necessary that the board of supervisors elected to work the public roads by contract, divide them into convenient links, let the contract for their working for not less than two nor more than four years, by sealed bids or by public outcry, to the lowest bidder who will give bond in double his bid for the perform
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mack S. Elmore v. State of Mississippi
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Road Contractor. Neglect of duty. Laws 1900, p. 153, ch. 119, sec. 10. Criminal law. Indictment. An indictment against a road contractor for neglect of duty in suffering a highway to be out of repair, under laws 1900, p. 153, ch. 119, sec. 10, making the same a misdemeanor, is demurrable if it fail to charge that the board of supervisors— (a) Had elected to work the highways by public contract; or, (b) Had divided them into convenient links; or, (e) Had let the contract for their working for not less than two .nor more than four years, by sealed bids, or at public outcry to the lowest bidder who would give bond in double the amount of his bid for the performance of his contract; or, if it fail to charge (d) That the defendant was a road contractor, and had become such under said law; or, (e) The facts of the case constituting the neglect of duty.