Brazele v. State
Brazele v. State
86 Miss. 286
Brazele v. State
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The indictment failed to charge that the defendant was “in any manner interested in the loss or gain of the said gaming table,” as required by the statute. This was a fatal omission.
The judgment is reversed, the demurrer sustained, the indictment quashed, and the defendant will be held to answer such proper indictment as may be hereafter preferred against him„
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.