Jordan v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court
Jordan v. State, 87 Miss. 170 (Miss. 1905)
39 So. 895
Ioon, Oali

Jordan v. State

Opinion of the Court

Oali-ioon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The affidavit on which this prosecution is based is that the defendant “did carry á certain deadly weapon — to wit, a pistol —concealed on his person, against the statute in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the state of Mississippi,” omitting the word “unlawfully.” The affidavit is fatally defective. It is entirely lawful to carry a pistol in *171some instances, and tbe failure of tbe affidavit to charge that it 'was unlawfully done is a fatal defect. It charges no offense, and perjury could not be sustained against any witness who might testify falsely in the case. Henry v. State, 33 Ala., 389; Perry v. People, 14 Ill., 496; Greer v. State, 50 Ind., 267 (19 Am. St. Rep., 709); Scudder v. State, 62 Ind., 13; State v. Whitaker, 85 N. C., 568. Our state has been strict in requiring a valid charge against the citizen. Louisville R. Co. v. Pool, 72 Miss., 490 (16 South. Rep., 753); Riggs v. State, 26 Miss., 51. The affidavit was not asked to be amended by the state.

Reversed and remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
William Jordan v. State of Mississippi
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
Ckiminai. Daw. Carrying concealed weapons. ' Code 1892, §§ 1026, 1027. • Affidavit. Indictment. Requisites of. An indictment or affidavit for carrying a concealed weapon, under Code 1892, §§ 1026, 1027, prohibiting the carrying of deadly weapons concealed by persons other than certain excepted ones, is fatally defective if it fail to charge that the weapon was “unlawfully” carried.