Ross v. Quick
Ross v. Quick
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The motion to discharge supersedeas in this case is hereby sustained, in so far as it supersedes the dissolution of the injunction enjoining the election commissioners of Jones county from holding the said election, from appointing managers and clerks to
So ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Silas V. Ross v. Jesse W. Quick
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Apeeal. Supersedeas. Code 1892, §49. Loaos 1906, eh. 169, p. 206. Discharge of supersedeas. Code 1892, § 4359. Supreme court practice. If in a suit to restrain proceedings under an act of the legislature, providing for the division of a county into two judicial districts upon an affirmative vote of the electors of a designated part of the county (Laws 1906, ch. 169, p. 206), the chancery court dissolve the injunction, award damages against complainants and dismiss the bill, holding the legislative act to be constitutional, and the complainants obtain a supersedeas appeal, under Code 1892, § 49, providing for such appeals, the supreme court, on motion of the appellees, will, under Code 1892, § 4359, providing for such procedure, discharge the supersedeas as to the dissolution of the injunction, but will continue it until the final hearing as to the decrees dismissing the suit and adjudging the act constitutional.