Fortinberry v. Holmes
Mississippi Supreme Court
Fortinberry v. Holmes, 89 Miss. 373 (Miss. 1906)
12 So. 799
Calhoon
Fortinberry v. Holmes
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
It is conceded, and. is plainly the law, that, if Holmes stood in loco parentis, there could be no civil action by the child. It is also conceded, as is clear from this record, that he was in that relation, unless it was changed by the testimony of the mother, contradicted by several witnesses, that, when she gave the child, she said she was not to be whipped. This does not alter the relation or change the status of the child, who was to be taken and treated as one of the children of the family.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Rosa Fortinberry, by next friend v. Marshall Holmes
- Cited By
- 11 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Parent and Child. Persons in loco parentis. Pmvishmént of child. ■ One standing in loco parentis toward a cliild is not liable in damages at its suit for chastisement inflicted, although its mother, when leaving it with him to be supported, educated, cared for, and “treated as his own child,” stated that it was not to be whipped.