Beaman v. Beaman
Beaman v. Beaman
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Without especial consideration in detail of the various grounds of demurrer so ably argued, it is plain that appellant’s case is without life if Mrs. Joanna Beaman, wife of Charles Beaman, could not buy, either for cash or on credit, at the'
The fact that the law emancipating women, and giving them the same rights as men to acquire and hold and sell property, is of no avail to Mrs. Beaman. Her husband had the same right. The law of emancipation gives her no right superior to his; but neither he nor she, being his wife, could acquire adverse rights hy purchase, because it is in contravention of public policy. Tender is unnecessary. The bill does not seek to stop any procedure, but recognizes the rights of Doty, the assignee, who must, of course, be protected.
Affirmed and remanded, with leave to answer within thirty days after mandate filed below.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Charles Beaman v. Edward Beaman
- Cited By
- 11 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Tenancy in Common. Rights of Cotenants.. Purchase of outstanding title. Wife of Cotenant. Husband and wife. Lands. Where the land of cotenants is subject to a superior lien granted by a former owner and is sold thereunder:— (a) A purchase by one cotenant will inure to the benefit of all the tenants; and (b) A purchase by the wife of one of the cotenants will likewise inure to the benefit of all of them, although married women have been wholly emancipated from common law disability on account of coverture.