Mississippi Supreme Court, 1907

Rush v. Pearson

Rush v. Pearson
Mississippi Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1907 · Mayes
92 Miss. 153; 45 So. 723

Rush v. Pearson

Opinion of the Court

Mayes, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It was necessary for Rush to tender into court the amount admitted to be due, or pay same, before he could maintain his injunction. Purvis v. Woodward, 78 Miss., 922, 29 South., 917; Crittenden v. Ragan, 89 Miss., 185, 42 South., 281; Lewis v. Boguechitto, 76 Miss., 356, 24 South., 875; M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Moseley, 52 Miss., 127. We think the decree of the chancery court was correct. The decree is affirmed and the cause remanded, with leave to complainant to pay the amount admitted to be due in ten days after mandate filed; otherwise, the injunction stands dissolved.

Affirmed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.