Adams v. Carter
Adams v. Carter
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court on the motions.
The motion to dismiss the appeal, because the appellant has
Tbe motion to strike out tbe designated four pages of tbe record, because -not a proper part of it, is sustained. Tbe record closed at tbe date of tbe judgment, and nothing happening subsequent to that time can properly be made a part of it.
See the case next following in this volume.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Wirt Adams, State Revenue Agent v. William M. Carter
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Supreme Court Practice. Appeal. Payment of judgment. Plea in lar. Motion to dismiss. Whether a plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment in his favor for only a part of his demand, is defeated by his accepting payment of the judgment, cannot be raised in the supreme court by motion to dismiss, but is the subject of a special plea in bar of the appeal. 2. Same. Proceedings after judgment, no part of record. , A written direction by plaintiff for the issuance of an execution on his judgment and the execution issued in pursuance thereof, with the return thereon, do not constitute any part of the record of the judgment and will be striken therefrom on motion.