Wright v. Correro

Mississippi Supreme Court
Wright v. Correro, 93 Miss. 306 (Miss. 1908)
47 So. 379
Calhoon

Wright v. Correro

Opinion of the Court

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is a common-law property right in a trademark, and, if used or imitated by others, an action will lie, and restrain by injunction may be had. McLean v. Fleming, 96 U. S. 245, 24 L. Ed. 828; 21 Ency. Pl. & Pr. 752; U. S. v. Steffens, 100 U. S. 82, 25 L. Ed. 550. These authorities are cited by counsel Tor appellee.

*310The other grounds of demurrer arise out of a misconception of the bill, which does show that the proceeding is against Cofrero individually, and by the appellee as an individual. The bill also shows that the bottles used by appellant are complainant’s property, and the demurrer admits that to be the fact.

Affirmed and remanded, and the appellant is allowed thirty days to answer from the date when the mandate is filed below.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Charles E. Wright v. Joseph Correro Coco-Cola v. Koca-Nola
Status
Published
Syllabus
Trade-Marks. Trade names. Property right. Action. Injunction. There is a common-law property right in a trade-mark, and, if used or imitated by others, an action will lie and in proper cases restraint by injunction may be had.