Brown v. State
Brown v. State
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
Section 1923 of the Code of 1906 provides that any witness may be examined touching his conviction of any crime; yet when counsel undertook to cross-examine as to this, and asked the witness if he had been convicted of more than one crime, the trial court refused to allow the question to be asked. The statute says that the witness may be examined touching his conviction of any crime; that is to say, not whether he has been convicted one time only, but of all convictions. The whole purpose of this testimony is addressed to the credibility of the
We do not think- the other exceptions of counsel are .well taken.
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Adaline Brown v. State of Mississippi
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Ceiminal Law and Procedure. Unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. Witnesses. Credibility. Code 1906, § 1923. Conviction of crime. ■The statute, Code 1906, § 1923, allowing a witness, as bearing on his credibility, to be examined touching his conviction of any crime, is not exhausted when he has been examined as to one crime; he may be examined touching his conviction of any number of crimes.