State v. Clark
State v. Clark
Opinion of the Court
after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.
The indictment is under section 1331, Code 1906, which is as follows: “Every person who shall mingle any poison with any food, drink, or medicine with intent to kill or injure any human being, or who shall wilfully poison any well, spring, or reservoir of water, shall, upon conviction, be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary not exceeding ten years, or in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or both.” Where a statute makes it a crime to do one thing or another, and a person by one act does both of the forbidden things, he violates the statute but once, and there is only one penalty; and an indictment under such a statute may in a single count charge the defendant with doing both of the forbidden things, “employing the conjunction ‘and’
Under this statute it is not necessary foir the indictment to charge to whom the poison belonged, nor the food, drink, or medicine with which it is mingled, nor that it was in possession of the person for whom it was intended, nor that such person was about to or intended to drink the same. The corpus delicti consists in the mingling of the poison with the food, drink, or medicine. Stanley v. State, 82 Miss. 498, 34 South. 360. The indictment sufficiently charges the criminal purpose in mingling the poison and whiskey.
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of Mississippi v. Isaah Clark
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Criminal Law and Procedure. Mingling poison with food with intent to Jcill. Code 1906, § 1331. Indictment. Duplicity. Ownership of poison. Ownership of food or drink. Possession. Corpus delicti. Under Code 1906, § 1331, making it a felony to mingle poison with any food, drink or medicine, with intent to kill or injure any human being, an indictment charging the mingling of carbolic acid with whisky with intent to “kill and injure” a designated person:— (a) Is not demurrable as charging two distinct offenses; and J6) It need not charge ownership of the poison, or of the food, drink or medicine with which the poison was mingled; nor [(e) Need it charge that the food, drink or medicine mingled with the poison was in the possession of the person intended to be killed or injured; nor ‘(d) That said person was about or intended to eat or drink the same, since (e) The corpus delicti consists of the mingling of the poison with the food, drink or medicine. 2. Same. Statutory crime. Indictment. Pleading. ( .Where a statute makes it a crime to do one thing or another, and a person by one act does both of them, he violates the statute but onc'e; and an indictment thereunder may in a single count charge the defendant with doing both, employing the conjunction “and” where the statute has “or,” and it Will not be double, and will be established at the trial by a proof of either.