Tynes v. Southern Pine Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court
Tynes v. Southern Pine Co., 100 Miss. 129 (Miss. 1911)
54 So. 885
Mayes

Tynes v. Southern Pine Co.

Opinion of the Court

Mayes, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the .-court.

There is no merit in the contention of appellant, and the decree of the court below, sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill, is correct.

. In view of section 6, article 8, of the Constitution of Mississippi of 1868, which provides “that there shall be established a common school fund, which shall consist of the proceeds of the lands now belonging to the state, heretofore granted by the United States, and of the land known as ‘swamp lands,’ except the swamp lands lying and situated on Pearl river, in the counties of Hancock, Marion, Lawrence, Simpson and Copiah,” etc., the act of 1871 could not authorize the issuance of patents to the Pearl River Navigation Company of the land which is in controversy in this suit. The. bill itself shows that the lands are not on Pearl river, and the language of the bill is even broader than this, in that the bill expressly states that the land is neither “on nor near Pearl river.” No act passed by the Legislature, in view of the article of the Constitution above referred to, could donate to anybody for any purpose land situated as was this land.

Affirmed.

This case was affirmed on June 27, 1910, but whs remanded to the docket July 4, 1910, on suggestion of error, and continued for re-argument. The case was again argued, and lengthy suggestions of error and briefs thereon filed by Hon. Edward Mayes and Green & Green, as amici curiae. The suggestion of error was finally overruled March 6, 1911.

Reference

Full Case Name
William E. Tynes v. Southern Pine Co
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Public Land. Swamp lands. School lands. Constitution 1868, article 8, section 6. In view of section 6, article 8, of the Constitution of Mississippi 1868, which provides “that there shall be established a common school fund which shall consist of the proceeds of the lands now-belonging to the state, heretofore granted by the United States, and of the land known as “swamp lands” except the swamp lands lying and situated on Pearl river.” The legislature had no authority to authorize the issuance of patents to a navigation company for swamp lands granted to the state, which were neither on nor near Pearl river; such lands being set aside for school purposes.