Frost v. State
Frost v. State
Opinion of the Court
The testimony in this case is vague and inconclusive to the last degree. The prosecutrix contradicts herself on one of the most vital points. In this extremely close case on the facts, the court permitted some half dozen witnesses to testify to what prosecutrix told them about all the details of the alleged offense, and all about the locality where the offense was alleged to have been com
Per Curiam. The above opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court, and for the reasons therein indicated the judgment is reversed and cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jim Frost v. State
- Cited By
- 9 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Rape. Evidence. Admissibility. On a trial of accused for rape it is reversible error to allow witnesses for the state to testify to what the prosecutrix told them about all the details of the alleged offense, and all about the locality where the offense was alleged to have been committed— the condition of the ground, footprints in the sand, depressions in the earth and cane and grass trampled down.