Indian Refining Co. v. Bishop
Indian Refining Co. v. Bishop
120 Miss. 872; 83 So. 276
Indian Refining Co. v. Bishop
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
It is not important to state the facts. The amount of "damages recovered is grossly excessive, and most of which were not occasioned directly by the attachment. Marqueze v. Southeimer, 59 Miss. 430.
If remittitur is entered, reducing the amount to two hundred and fifty dollars, the jugment will he affirmed; otherwise, reversed generally.
Affirmed Conditionally.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.